The NFL is escalating its fight with sports prediction markets, urging federal lawmakers to clamp down on sports-related event contracts that can be traded nationwide. In written testimony to the House Committee on Agriculture, NFL EVP Jeff Miller argued that these markets sidestep state betting rules and lack the safeguards regulators impose on sportsbooks.
The core friction is jurisdictional and it is moving quickly. Prediction markets operate in all 50 states, while sports betting is legal in 39 states plus D.C., creating a de facto workaround in places that have not legalized wagering, as reported by sports business coverage. The NFL says that gap matters because state regulators and leagues can influence what bets are allowed and at what limits, while prediction markets fall under federal oversight via the CFTC.
The leagueâs catalyst is less about fans finding another way to bet and more about integrity, scale, and ânovelâ contracts that are hard to police. Miller warned that prediction-market activity could exceed sportsbook wagering and create âsubstantially greater risks to contest integrity,â noting examples like contracts tied to whether terms such as âconcussion protocolâ get mentioned on broadcasts, cited in coverage of the testimony.
Next steps likely run through the CFTC and Congress, with pressure from leagues and state gaming regulators colliding with platforms that argue they are regulated markets, not gambling. The takeaway is that sports prediction markets are headed for a higher-stakes federal rules fight, and the outcome could reshape how âevent contractsâ are allowed to touch sports.