Are tariffs becoming a tool of economic strategy—or geopolitical brinkmanship? Trump’s latest moves show tariffs used not only to shield US factories, but to influence foreign policy: threats of new tariffs on Russia’s partners are part of cease-fire negotiations on Ukraine (New York Times), while the US-China truce was extended for another 90 days in a bid to avoid trade chaos during ongoing talks. For now, both the US and China hold tariffs at 30% and 10%, respectively, keeping supply chains on edge.
Europe and Japan, meanwhile, are watching warily as carveouts and waivers proliferate and new preferential deals muddy the playing field. Despite headline optimism in markets, export and import flows between the world’s two largest economies have been slipping for months, underlying the "stabilization for now, uncertainty tomorrow" mood now governing global trade.
Tariff Diplomacy: Global Jitters and Unintended Ripples
Get ahead before the market does
Get the free daily briefing on markets and the economy delivered before they're priced in.
By subscribing, you accept our Terms & Privacy Policy.
Keep reading
Strategic Non-Alignment Yields Economic Rents Amid 7% Fragmentation Risk
BRICS+ now controls 35% of global GDP at purchasing power parity compared to 30% for the G7, creating a structural arbitrage window for non-aligned states to capture premiums from both blocs.
How Midstream Dominance Shapes Energy and Critical Mineral Markets
AI, electrification, and grid expansion need far more minerals than current systems can supply, locking in bottlenecks and a friend-shoring premium.
The Resource Cold War Maps Energy and Rare Earth Bottlenecks
Energy and critical minerals have become instruments of state power, and the bottleneck sits in refining, not mining.